MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177037714 · doi:10.18280/ejee.230302

Battery Charger Utilizing Coupled Inductor Based High Gain Bidirectional DC-DC Converter: Analysis, Design, and Implementation

2021· article· en· W3177037714 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmadasraf A. Mulla, Vishal J. Dobariya, Rajan V. Vamja, Arindam Sircar

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorBoost converterCapacitorBattery chargerBuck converterBattery (electricity)Buck–boost converterVoltageElectrical engineeringĆuk converterHigh voltageForward converterElectronic engineeringComputer scienceMicrocontrollerEngineeringPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bidirectional dc-dc converter with high voltage gain and high efficiency plays an important role in the designing of battery charging systems. In this paper, design and development of a battery charging system utilizing coupled inductor based high gain dc-dc converter is presented. The converter uses a clamp capacitor network to recover the leakage energy of a coupled inductor. The converter has inherent soft-switching capability during turn ON, which ensures high efficiency at high switching frequency. Design equations to derive value of different passive components are given and a step-wise exclusive design to construct coupled inductor is presented. A 50 kHz, 500 W laboratory prototype has been designed, which can increase the voltage with 10 gain (boost operation) in one direction and can reduce the voltage at (1/10) gain (buck operation) in other direction. The CCCV battery charging algorithm is implemented using generic ARM Cortex-M4 microcontroller. Extensive experiments have been performed and the experimental results are presented in buck, boost, and battery charging operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Electrical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207