MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177070743 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6706400

The human right to essential medicines applies to Canadians

2021· article· en· W3177070743 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Katrina Perehudoff, Nav Persaud, Lisa Forman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversiteit GentUniversity of TorontoCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsEssential medicinesAccess to medicinesRight to healthHuman rightsAlternative medicineEconomic growthMedicineEnvironmental healthBusinessHealth carePolitical sciencePublic healthNursingLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poor access to medicines for more than a million Canadians is more than a health risk and an economic burden, it is a rights violation. The Sustainable Development Goal for health underscores the link between access to needed or essential medicines, social determinants of health such as food and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicHuman Rights and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207