MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177087298 · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.018

Spinal arachnoid web—a distinct entity of focal arachnopathy with favorable long-term outcome after surgical resection: analysis of a multicenter patient population

2021· article· en· W3177087298 on OpenAlex
Stefanos Voglis, Alexander Romagna, Menno R. Germans, Isaac Carreno, Martin N. Stienen, Anna Henzi, Katrin Frauenknecht, Elisabeth J. Rushing, Granit Molliqaj, Kayee Tung, Enrico Tessitore, Howard J. Ginsberg, David Bellut

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Spine Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSyringomyeliaMyelopathySurgeryMagnetic resonance imagingRetrospective cohort studyLaminectomyLaminoplastyIntramedullary rodSyrinx (medicine)RadiologySpinal cord compressionSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal arachnoid web (SAW) is a rare condition characterized by focal thickening of the arachnoid membrane causing displacement and compression of the spinal cord with progressive symptoms and neurological deficits. Recent reports and clinical experience suggest that SAW is a distinct entity with specific radiological findings and treatment strategies distinguishable from other arachnopathies and potential differential diagnoses. PURPOSE: To better define the diagnostic and clinical features, treatment options and outcomes of surgically treated SAW. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve cases of SAW surgically treated at three different centers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported and neurological outcome measurements (pain, sensory-motor deficits, vegetative dysfunctions) were assessed at follow-up timepoints. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data on all patients surgically treated for SAW from three participating neurosurgical centers between 2014 and 2020. Clinicopathological data, including neurological presentation, radiological and histological findings and outcome data were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve radiologically and surgically confirmed cases of SAW were analyzed. Mean patient age was 54.7 [±12.7], 67% were male. All SAWs were located in the posterior thoracic dural sac. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the "scalpel sign" - a characteristic focal dorsal indentation of the spinal cord resembling a scalpel blade - was identified in all patients. A focal intramedullary syrinx was present in 83%. Preoperative clinical symptoms included signs of myelopathy, pain, weakness and sensory loss, most commonly affecting the trunk/upper back or lower extremities. Laminectomy or laminoplasty with intradural excision of the SAW was the surgical treatment of choice in all cases. Intraoperative ultrasound was valuable to visualize the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow obstruction, confirm the SAW location before dura incision and to control adequacy of resection. After surgery, sensory loss and weakness in particular showed significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The present study comprises the largest series of surgically treated SAW, underscoring the unique clinical, radiographic, histopathological, and surgical findings. We want to emphasize SAW being a distinct entity of spinal arachnopathy with a favorable long-term outcome if diagnosed correctly and treated surgically. Intraoperative ultrasound aids visualizing the SAW before dural incision, as well as verifying restored CSF flow after resection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it