La enseñanza de primeras letras en el Colegio de La Pureza: una primera aproximación a la labor literaria de Alberta Giménez
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work delves into the circumstances ”•both domestic and pedagogical”• which influenced the literary work of Alberta Giménez Adrover, opening a path of research aimed at analysing the poetic and dramatic production of one of the most distinguished voices of education in the Balearic Islands. Furthermore, this initial approach to her work seeks to point out some of the roles, both poetic and theatrical, which she carried out in her teaching activities at the «Colegio de La Pureza» and the «Escuela Normal de Maestras de Palma». To this end, the documentation provided by her main biographers has been particularly helpful, especially the testimonies and documents collected by Margarita Juan. Literary writing, in the case of Alberta Giménez, should not be understood simply as a creative inclination resulting from individual necessity; it is a fundamental part of the teaching programme and comprehensive education promoted by the «Colegio de La Pureza».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".