MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177119865 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.33478

Henri Tomasi : Être ou ne pas être moderne

2015· book-chapter· fr· W3177119865 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Duchesneau

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous explorerons les débuts de la carrière d’Henri Tomasi dans les années 1930, alors que le milieu musical français et international est en mutation. Après une période où les avant-gardes ont bouleversé l’ordre musical, les années 1930 offrent aux artistes un dilemme : poursuivre dans la voie d’une modernité fracassante ou prendre un autre chemin. Pour bien des artistes, il ne s’agit pas d’adopter un conservatisme qui les tiendrait prisonniers d’une esthétique dépassée. Il ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207