MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stable Expression of the Sodium Iodide Symporter (NIS) in Metastatic Cancer Cells: A Novel Imaging Tool

2013· article· en· W3177134199 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth Bradley Gagnon, Dean Chapman, David M. L. Cooper, Sally Caine, Valerie M. K. Verge, Helen Nichol

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium-iodide symporterIn vivoCancer researchMetastasisPathologyMelanomaCancerPrimary tumorSymporterMedicineChemistryBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In most cancer patients, tumor metastasis to distant organs is the leading cause of death. Tumor cells dissociated from the primary site generally first encounter the lung, making it a significant site of tumor metastasis. We have generated a construct containing the cDNA for the rat sodium iodide symporter (NIS) and stably expressed it in mouse melanoma (B16F0) cells. Intravenous injection of these genetically‐modified B16F0 cells resulted in black tumor nodules throughout the lungs after 14–21 days. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed numerous mitotic figures in these tumor nodules indicating cell proliferation. In addition, tumor cells were found surrounding capillaries suggesting both angiogenesis and possible routes for metastasis. High resolution in vivo imaging of cancer tumors in large opaque animals is extremely difficult. The high energy X‐rays produced by synchrotron light are capable of overcoming this obstacle and producing in vivo images of these metastatic tumors with much greater sensitivity. Thus, in this study we have developed a novel animal model using these modified tumor cells to accumulate iodine as a contrast agent for in vivo synchrotron imaging of metastatic lung cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207