A Finite Element Modeling and Simulation of Human Temporomandibular Joint with and Without TM Disorders: An Indian Experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is anatomically the most intricate joint which connects the lower jaw to the upper jaw and regulates jaw movements. It significantly deals with mastication and speech. It is hence imperative to study the mechanics and functioning of the jaw joint to devise alternative solutions for its replacement whenever required. Further, human skulls are anthropologically categorized into three types – African, Asian and European. Out of these, the Indian skull is also a bit different than its Asian counterparts because of its osteology and skeletal biology. Hence, a comprehensive biomechanical and computational study is essential to provide customized solutions. For the present study, four different loading conditions are selected to perform finite element analysis on the human skull, Anonymized and unidentifiable CT scan data sets from open-source web platforms are converted to STL and then 3D models using 3D slicer. Finite element analysis of jaw joint is carried out. Results based on Von Mises stress studies show significant behavioral differences under varying load conditions. Hence, it is crucial to identify solutions for TMJ disorders of the Indian population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it