A Full-State Robust Extended Kalman Filter for Orientation Tracking During Long-Duration Dynamic Tasks Using Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Units
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and robust orientation estimation using magnetic and inertial measurement units (MIMUs) has been a challenge for many years in long-duration measurements of joint angles and pedestrian dead-reckoning systems and has limited several real-world applications of MIMUs. Thus, this research aimed at developing a full-state Robust Extended Kalman Filter (REKF) for accurate and robust orientation tracking with MIMUs, particularly during long-duration dynamic tasks. First, we structured a novel EKF by including the orientation quaternion, non-gravitational acceleration, gyroscope bias, and magnetic disturbance in the state vector. Next, the a posteriori error covariance matrix equation was modified to build a REKF. We compared the accuracy and robustness of our proposed REKF with four filters from the literature using optimal filter gains. We measured the thigh, shank, and foot orientation of nine participants while performing short- and long-duration tasks using MIMUs and a camera motion-capture system. REKF outperformed the filters from literature significantly (p < 0.05) in terms of accuracy and robustness for long-duration tasks. For example, for foot MIMU, the median RMSE of (roll, pitch, yaw) were (6.5, 5.5, 7.8) and (22.8, 23.9, 25) deg for REKF and the best filter from the literature, respectively. For short-duration trials, REKF achieved significantly (p < 0.05) better or similar performance compared to the literature. We concluded that including non-gravitational acceleration, gyroscope bias, and magnetic disturbance in the state vector, as well as using a robust filter structure, is required for accurate and robust orientation tracking, at least in long-duration tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".