MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177270782 · doi:10.1177/21514593211027675

Early Recovery of Walking Ability in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Hip-Wearable Exoskeleton Robot: A Case-Controlled Clinical Trial

2021· article· en· W3177270782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kazunori Koseki, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki, Kenichi Yoshikawa, Koichi Iwai, Yuko Hashizume, Ryo Nakazawa, Yutaka Kohno

Bibliographic record

VenueGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsWOMACMedicineRange of motionPhysical therapyOsteoarthritisGaitPreferred walking speedPhysical medicine and rehabilitationKnee JointRandomized controlled trialGait analysisPowered exoskeletonRehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The Honda Walking Assist (HWA) is a hip-wearable exoskeleton robot for gait training that assists in hip flexion and extension movements to guide hip joint movements during gait. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of walking exercises with HWA in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 10 patients (11 knees) in the HWA group and 11 patients (11 knees) in the control group who underwent conventional physical therapy. The patients assigned to the HWA group underwent a total of 17-20 gait training sessions, each lasting approximately 20 min from week 1 to 5 following TKA. Self-selected walking speed (SWS), maximum walking speed (MWS), range of motion (ROM), knee extension and flexion torque, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index subscales of pain (WOMAC-p) and physical function (WOMAC-f) scores were measured preoperatively, at 2, 4, and 8 weeks following TKA. RESULTS: Interventions were successfully completed in all patients, with no severe adverse events. A significant difference was noted in the time × group interaction effect between preoperative and week 2 SWS and MWS. Regarding knee function, there was a significant difference in the time × group interaction between preoperative and week 2 active ROM extension; however, no significant difference in knee torque, WOMAC-p, and WOMAC-f scores were observed. In the between-group post hoc analysis, WOMAC-f in the HWA group was higher than that in the control group at week 8. DISCUSSION: Although the control group showed a temporary reduction in SWS and MWS 2 weeks after TKA, the HWA group did not. These results suggest that HWA intervention promotes early improvement in walking ability after TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The gait training using HWA was safe and feasible and could be effective for the early improvement of walking ability in TKA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & RehabilitationSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207