MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177271145 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-10098

Compiling and correlating paleostress fields across Central Europe - A paleostress chart for northern Bavaria and adjacent areas

2021· article· en· W3177271145 on OpenAlexaff
Florian Duschl, Tobias Stephan, Saskia Köhler, Daniel Köhn, Harald Stollhofen, Michael Drews

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTectonicsFault (geology)SeismologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed knowledge on the temporal and spatial distribution of faults and fractures not only reveals the geodynamic and tectonic evolution of the lithosphere. It is also of increasing importance with regard to economic, social, and environmental challenges such as nuclear waste disposal, gas storage, geothermal energy, natural hazards, and mineral resource exploration. In this context reliable data on both timing and kinematics of deformation and their regional impact on faulting and fracture formation provide crucial information to evaluate exploration, storage, and production risks, which in turn stresses the need for comprehensive data on paleostress fields and their influence on deformation, fault reactivation, fluid activity, and hydrothermal mineralization. In this study we present a first comprehensive approach to compile and visualize information on the crustal paleostress field of Central Europe with a focus on northern Bavaria and adjacent areas. The compilation includes published structural data from kinematic paleostress analyses (e.g. fault-slip analysis, tectonic stylolites) and geo- and thermochronological ages of fracture mineralization and fault activity, respectively. The present compilation comprises structural records from more than 40 studies and age information from more than 100 geo-thermochronological studies. All structural data are categorized according to its tectonic stress regime and quality-ranked for reliability and comparability. The consequent linkage of structural data with thermochronological data wherever possible allows to correlate local paleostress fields and deformation patterns with regional to global tectonic events. As one result, the “Paleostress Chart for Northern Bavaria and adjacent Areas” visualizes the temporal and spatial evolution of several regions in Central Europe together with known tectonic phases, sedimentary unconformities and the plate kinematic framework since the Carboniferous. This compilation may therefore help to better understand the timing and the spatio-temporal evolution of crustal stress patterns for tectonic events across Central Europe in the context of plate tectonics. We aim to supplement and improve existing paleostress models on both, regional, and temporal scale by compiling published and original data. In the long term the database is intended as a continuing compilation where data from all across Central Europe are supposed to be included and refined subsequently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207