Essential Protein Prediction Based on node2vec and XGBoost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essential proteins are a vital part of the survival of organisms and cells. Identification of essential proteins lays a solid foundation for understanding protein functions and discovering drug targets. The traditional biological experiments are expensive and time-consuming. Recently, many computational methods have been proposed. However, some noises in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks affect the efficiency of essential protein prediction. It is necessary to construct a credible PPI network by using other useful biological information to reduce the effects of these noises. In this article, we proposed a model, Ess-NEXG, to identify essential proteins, which integrates biological information, including orthologous information, subcellular localization information, RNA-Seq information, and PPI network. In our model, first, we constructed a credible weighted PPI network by using different types of biological information. Second, we extracted the topological features of proteins in the constructed weighted PPI network by using the node2vec technique. Last, we used eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to predict essential proteins by using the topological features of proteins. The extensive results show that our model has better performance than other computational methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".