Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Military Staff: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2] Injury prevention during physical activity in the ... [3] Injuries and injury risk factors among men and ... [4] Injuries at a Canadian national taekwondo championships ... [5] Epidemiology of injuries and illnesses during the ... [6] Effects of frequency and duration of training on ... [7] Longterm disability among aviators in Japan air self-defense force ... [8] Air force special operations command special ... [9] International statistical classification ... [10] Risk factors for chronic low back pain ... [11] Effect of nicotine on bone healing in rats-A ... [12] Hole's essentials of human anatomy ... [13] Incidence and risk factors for medial tibial ... [14] Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear ... [15] A history of shoulder instability in the military ... [16] Disease and nonbattle injuries sustained by a US army brigade [17] Self-reported musculoskeletal complaints ... [18] Military physical training-related injuries: A review ... [19] Incidence and characteristics of traumatic shoulder [20] A description of injuries in men and women ... [21] Gender disparities within US army orthopedic ... [22] The occurrence and severity of musculoskeletal ... [23] The occurrence and severity of musculoskeletal ... [24] Risk factors for medial tibial stress syndrome ... [25] A prospective field study of U.S. Army trainees ... [26] Musculoskeletal injuries and United States army readiness part .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".