MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177456965

Aplicación móvil para la organización de referencias bibliográficas por las normas de Vancouver

2021· article· es· W3177456965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEngineering and Information Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: frecuentemente se identifican dificultades en la organización de las referencias bibliográficas por las Normas de Vancouver. Objetivo: desarrollar la aplicación para dispositivos móviles Normas de Vancouver-APK para la organización de las referencias bibliográficas. Método: se utilizó HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Java, Visual Studio Code, Android Studio y adobe Photoshop. Resultados: en este trabajo se muestra el prototipo de aplicación Normas de Vancouver-APK para dispositivos móviles, sus ventajas, la dirección electrónica donde se puede descargar, y el manual de usuario para generar y recuperar las referencias bibliográficas a través del llenado del formulario según el tipo de documento utilizado. Conclusiones: la aplicación contribuye a la organización de las referencias bibliográficas por las Normas de Vancouver de una manera más fácil, limitando la complejidad para el que lo redacta. Palabras clave: aplicaciones móviles; normas de Vancouver; organización de referencias bibliográficas. ABSTRACT Introduction: Difficulties are frequently identified in the organization of bibliographic references by the Vancouver Standards. Objective: To develop the Vancouver Rules-APK application for mobile devices for the organization of bibliographic references. Method: HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Java, Visual Studio Code, Android Studio and Adobe Photoshop were used for its construction. Results: This paper shows the Vancouver Standards-APK application prototype for mobile devices, its advantages, the electronic address where it can be downloaded, and the user manual to generate and retrieve bibliographic references by filling in the form according to the type of document used. Conclusions: The application contributes to the organization of the bibliographic references by the Vancouver Standards in an easier way for the one who writes it. Keywords: mobile applications; Vancouver Standards; organization of bibliographic references.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it