Efecto de cinco niveles de balance electrolítico dietario en el crecimiento, características de carcasa y metabolitos de suero sanguíneo del cuy (Cavia porcellus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realizó un estudio para determinar los efectos del balance electrolítico dietario (BED) sobre el rendimiento productivo, características de la canal y metabolitos sanguíneos del cuy en una granja experimental de Cajamarca, Perú. Se utilizaron 150 cuyes machos distribuidos en cinco tratamientos con cinco niveles de BED: 100, 200, 300, 400 y 500 mEq/kg. Cada tratamiento tuvo seis repeticiones y cada repetición con cinco cuyes/poza. Los cuyes consumieron alimento concentrado durante 42 días. Al término del periodo experimental se sacrificaron seis cuyes por tratamiento para determinar el rendimiento de carcasa, pesos relativos de las vísceras y concentración de metabolitos sanguíneos. Se encontraron diferencias (p<0.05) en el peso corporal final, ganancia de peso e índice de conversión alimenticia a favor de cuyes con BED de 300 mEq/kg. No hubo diferencias significativas entre tratamientos en las características de la canal ni en los valores de metabolitos en sangre, excepto la creatinina. Según los resultados de este estudio, el cuy podría ser alimentado con 300 mEq/kg de BED, con resultados satisfactorios de crecimiento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".