MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Association between polymorphisms in the <i>FADS</i> gene cluster and the plasma triacylglycerol response to an ω‐3 PUFA supplementation

2012· article· en· W3177474613 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert Cormier, Iwona Rudkowska, Ann-Marie Paradis, Élisabeth Thifault, Véronique Garneau, Simone Lemieux, Patrick Couture, Marie‐Claude Vohl

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPolyunsaturated fatty acidTriglycerideFish oilGenotypingInternal medicinePolymorphism (computer science)BiologyTaqManEndocrinologyGeneGenotypeMedicineGeneticsCholesterolFish <Actinopterygii>Fatty acidBiochemistryReal-time polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the present study is to increase knowledge about the effects of a supplementation with omega‐3 (ω‐3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) on lipid profile in relation to the presence of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the FADS gene cluster. Plasma lipid levels were measured in 122 subjects prior and after a 5 g/d fish oil (including 3 g/d of ω‐3 PUFA) supplement for 6‐weeks. DNA was extracted and then genotyping of 19 SNPs (covering 100% of the FADS gene cluster area) was performed using TaqMan technology. The ω‐3 PUFA supplementation had an independent effect on plasma TG levels, as expected. Thirty‐six individuals (29.6%) were classified as non‐responders, meaning there was no reduction of plasma TG levels, and eighty‐six (70.4%) were responders. Two SNPs ( rs174546 and rs174611 ) were significantly associated (p ≤ 0.05) with plasma triglyceride (TG) levels, before and after the supplementation. These results suggest that SNPs influencing plasma TG levels are also those influencing the plasma TG response to a TG‐lowering therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→