MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hypothalamus volume and DNA methylation of stress axis genes in major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND study report

2021· article· en· W3177494555 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jee Su Suh, Laura M. Fiori, Mohammad Ali, Kate L. Harkness, Milita Ramonas, Luciano Minuzzi, Stefanie Hassel, Stephen C. Strother, Mojdeh Zamyadi, Stephen R. Arnott, Faranak Farzan, Jane A. Foster, Raymond W. Lam, Glenda MacQueen, Roumen Milev, Daniel J. Müller, Sagar V. Parikh, Susan Rotzinger, Roberto B. Sassi, Cláudio N. Soares, Rudolf Uher, Sidney H. Kennedy, Gustavo Turecki, Benício N. Frey

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoneuroendocrinology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthMcGill UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityBaycrest HospitalDalhousie UniversityHamilton Health SciencesDouglas Mental Health University InstituteJuravinski HospitalMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchH. Lundbeck A/SGovernment of OntarioOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceOntario Brain InstituteOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationServierPfizerBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsFKBP5Major depressive disorderDNA methylationGlucocorticoid receptorMethylationCpG siteInternal medicineAntidepressantBiomarkerOncologyGeneDepression (economics)MedicinePsychologyEndocrinologyGlucocorticoidGene expressionBiologyGeneticsHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is considered one of the mechanisms underlying the development of major depressive disorder (MDD), but the exact nature of this dysfunction is unknown. We investigated the relationship between hypothalamus volume (HV) and blood-derived DNA methylation in MDD. We obtained brain MRI, clinical and molecular data from 181 unmedicated MDD and 90 healthy control (HC) participants. MDD participants received a 16-week standardized antidepressant treatment protocol, as part of the first Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) study. We collected bilateral HV measures via manual segmentation by two independent raters. DNA methylation and RNA sequencing were performed for three key HPA axis-regulating genes coding for the corticotropin-binding protein (CRHBP), glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5). We used elastic net regression to perform variable selection and assess predictive ability of methylation variables on HV. Left HV was negatively associated with duration of current episode (ρ = −0.17, p = 0.035). We did not observe significant differences in HV between MDD and HC or any associations between HV and treatment response at weeks 8 or 16, overall depression severity, illness duration or childhood maltreatment. We also did not observe any differentially methylated CpG sites between MDD and HC groups. After assessing functionality by correlating methylation levels with RNA expression of the respective genes, we observed that the number of functionally relevant CpG sites differed between MDD and HC groups in FKBP5 (χ2 = 77.25, p < 0.0001) and NR3C1 (χ2 = 7.29, p = 0.007). Cross-referencing functionally relevant CpG sites to those that were highly ranked in predicting HV in elastic net modeling identified one site from FKBP5 (cg03591753) and one from NR3C1 (cg20728768) within the MDD group. Stronger associations between DNA methylation, gene expression and HV in MDD suggest a novel putative molecular pathway of stress-related sensitivity in depression. Future studies should consider utilizing the epigenome and ultra-high field MR data which would allow the investigation of HV sub-fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychoneuroendocrinologySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207