MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3177527454 · doi:10.1029/2021gl094263

Laurentide Ice Saddle Mergers Drive Rapid Sea Level Drops During Glaciations

2021· article· en· W3177527454 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weiwen Ji, Alexander A. Robel, Eli Tziperman, Jun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese Government ScholarshipNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIce sheetGeologyGlacial periodSea iceSea levelOceanographyAntarctic sea iceArctic ice packClimatologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent glacial periods have included several periods of rapid sea level drop that are still not well understood. Here we show that rapid sea level drops can occur due to merger of two separate ice sheets without correspondingly rapid climate forcing. Using the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM), we simulate glaciation of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) by gradually decreasing equilibrium‐line altitude (ELA). Merger of the extended Keewatin sector of the Laurentide Ice Sheet with Labrador sector of the Laurentide Ice Sheet south of Hudson Bay causes a positive feedback between increasing surface elevation and increasing surface mass balance in the merger region, leading to fast ice sheet growth. The simulated saddle merger of LIS lowers sea level by 20 m in less than 20 kyr with periods of sea level fall exceeding 2 m/kyr, similar to those observed in paleo‐sea level records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→