MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177614251 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.092010

Constraining the NuMI neutrino flux using inverse muon decay reactions in MINERvA

2021· article· en· W3177614251 on OpenAlexaff
D. Ruterbories, Z. Ahmad Dar, F. Akbar, M. V. Ascencio, A. Bashyal, A. Bercellie, M. Betancourt, A. Bodek, J. L. Bonilla, A. Bravar, H. S. Budd, G. Cáceres, T. Cai, M. F. Carneiro, G. A. Díaz, H. da Motta, J. Félix, L. Fields, A. Filkins, R. Fine, A. M. Gago, H. Gallagher, A. Ghosh, R. Gran, D. A. Harris, S. Henry, C. Jena, S. Jena, J. Kleykamp, M. Kordosky, D. Last, T. Le, A. Lozano, X.-G. Lu, E. Maher, S. Manly, W. A. Mann, C. Mauger, K. S. McFarland, A. M. McGowan, B. Messerly, J. Miller, J. G. Morfín, D. Naples, J. K. Nelson, C. Nguyen, A. Norrick, A. Olivier, V. Paolone, G. N. Perdue, Komninos-John Plows, M. A. Ramírez, H. Ray, H. Schellman, C. J. Solano Salinas, Hang Su, M. Sultana, V. S. Syrotenko, E. Valencia, N. H. Vaughan, A. V. Waldron, B. Yaeggy, K. Yang, L. Zazueta

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersFermilabFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoDivision of ChemistryComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeOffice of SciencePontificia Universidad Católica del PerúConsejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación TecnológicaResearch Corporation for Scientific AdvancementNarodowe Centrum NaukiH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of RochesterBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsMuonMuon neutrinoNuclear physicsFlux (metallurgy)Particle physicsInverseNeutrino detectorNeutrino oscillationChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inverse muon decay, ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{e}$, is a reaction whose cross section can be predicted with very small uncertainties. It has a neutrino energy threshold of $\ensuremath{\approx}11\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ and can be used to constrain the high-energy part of the flux in the NuMI neutrino beam. This reaction is the dominant source of events which only contain high-energy muons nearly parallel to the direction of the neutrino beam. We have isolated a sample of hundreds of such events in neutrino and antineutrino enhanced beams, and have constrained the predicted high-energy flux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207