Enhancing the Utilization of Processing Elements in Spatial Deep Neural Network Accelerators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equipping mobile platforms with deep learning applications is very valuable. Providing healthcare services in remote areas, improving privacy, and lowering needed communication bandwidth are the advantages of such platforms. Designing an efficient computation engine enhances the performance of these platforms while running deep neural networks (DNNs). Energy-efficient DNN accelerators use skipping sparsity and early negative output feature detection to prune the computations. Spatial DNN accelerators in principle can support computation-pruning techniques compared to other common architectures, such as systolic arrays. These accelerators need a separate data distribution fabric like buses or trees with support for high bandwidth to run the mentioned techniques efficiently and avoid network on chip (NoC)-based stalls. Spatial designs suffer from divergence and unequal work distribution. Therefore, applying computation-pruning techniques into a spatial design, which is even equipped with an NoC that supports high bandwidth for the processing elements (PEs), still causes stalls inside the computation engine. In a spatial architecture, the PEs that perform their tasks earlier have a slack time compared to others. In this article, we propose an architecture with a negligible area overhead based on sharing the scratchpads in a novel way between the PEs to use the available slack time caused by applying computation-pruning techniques or the used NoC format. With the use of our dataflow, a spatial engine can benefit from computation-pruning and data reuse techniques more efficiently. When compared to the reference design, our proposed method achieves a speedup of ×1.24 and an energy efficiency of ×1.18 per inference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".