MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177787770 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-2863

Abstract 2863: Cancer extracellular vesicles induce lymph node metastasis via neutrophil extracellular traps

2021· article· en· W3177787770 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Su, Ariane Brassard, Ramin Rohanizadeh, Iqraa Dhoparee‐Doomah, Betty Giannias, France Bourdeau, Veena Sangwan, Roni Rayes, Jonathan Spicer, Lorenzo Ferri, Jonathan Cools‐Lartigue

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetastasisNeutrophil extracellular trapsCancerLymphatic systemCancer researchCancer cellMedicineMelanomaExtracellularImmune systemLymphImmunologyPathologyBiologyInflammationCell biologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In most human cancers, regional lymph nodes (LNs) are the first sites of metastasis. In addition to being an important part of the tumor staging system, with the advent of novel therapies, lymph node metastasis has become a crucial clinical intervention point before distant metastasis, the leading cause of cancer-associated deaths. To initiate metastasis, the conditions of LNs need to be optimized for tumor cell deposition and growth. This process is believed to be mediated by the activation of immune cells including polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), and tumor derived factors, such as extracellular vesicles (EVs). Indeed, tumor derived EVs (tEVs) were shown to prepare sentinel LNs for increased melanoma metastasis, however, the cellular mechanism is not well defined. Early observations suggest that PMNs and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), DNA comprising structures that are extruded in response to inflammatory cues, are associated with adverse oncologic outcomes. Moreover, PMNs exhibit considerable plasticity to tEVs, as gastric tEVs can polarize PMN toward a pro-tumor (N2) phenotype and induce NET formation. Thus, one potential mechanism of increased LN metastasis is that tEVs recruit PMNs and propend NETs formation. Here, we show that lymphatic PMN accumulation is associated with higher rates of LN metastasis in human esophageal cancer patients. Furthermore, we demonstrate that LN PMN accumulation is mediated by tEVs-lymphatic interaction both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, we demonstrate that lymphatic PMN facilitate metastasis through the accumulation of PMN prior to tumor ingress. Using Boyden chamber assays, we observed an increase in PMN migration towards tEVs educated lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). Moreover, ELISA showed tEVs educated LEC increased secretion of the PMN chemoattractants CXCL4 and CXCL8. Additionally, through confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence, we observed that tEVs induced PMN recruitment to LNs and NETs released in vivo in a dose-dependent manner. Finally, using transgenic pad4-/- knockout mice, which are unable to generate NETs, we showed that the absence of NETs led to decreased LN metastasis. Together, these findings highlight the role of tumor derived tEVs both as PMN recruiters to LNs and NETs inducers. By further investigating the detailed mechanism and the efficiency of NETs targeting agents, this project will lead to major advances in the management of cancer patients. Citation Format: Xin SU, Ariane Brassard, Ramin Rohanizadeh, Iqraa Dhoparee-Doomah, Betty Giannias, France Bourdeau, Veena Sangwan, Roni F. Rayes, Jonathan D. Spicer, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Jonathan J. Cools-Lartigue. Cancer extracellular vesicles induce lymph node metastasis via neutrophil extracellular traps [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2863.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207