MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177788936 · doi:10.1093/litimag/imab006

Rupert Brooke’s Mysterious Widow: The Marchesa Agnes Capponi

2021· article· en· W3177788936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maryanne Felter

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterary Imagination · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)Art historyMinor (academic)ArtPerformance artHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crossing the American continent in the spring of 1913, Rupert Brooke stopped at the Chateau Lake Louise. There he met Leona1 Agnes Smith, Marchesa Capponi. Brooke’s letters to Agnes are few and short; perhaps because of this, no one has paid as much attention to her as to Brooke’s other lovers. Perhaps, too, because the letters from Rupert to Agnes have been known only in incomplete form, some have seen her as a very minor player in Rupert’s life. In fact, Martin and Hall, in their book Rupert Brooke in Canada, state that “In Washington [D.C] Brooke saw the Marchesa Capponi, but the spark had gone out of the affair. The attraction probably had been as much Lake Louise as the widow in the first place.”2 No doubt, Lake Louise was, for Rupert, a beautiful place. But Agnes Smith Capponi was, if a minor character, attractive to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiterary ImaginationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207