MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177849665 · doi:10.52344/hfr.2021.5.1.51

A Study on the Impact of Ownership Type on Vacancy Rate

2021· article· en· W3177849665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hoil Lee, Jina Kim, Jin-Young Kim, Seung-Han Ro

Bibliographic record

VenueHousing Finance Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnergy and Environmental Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)Service (business)MarketingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to analyse the impact on the public utility rate according to the type of ownership of the merchant. To this end, Seoul City’s commercial data were used as of the 3rd quarter of 2017 and it is meaningful to analyze the public service rate by dividing the type of store price based on ownership as well as general characteristics of the store. The main results showed positive correlation for variables with floor area exceeding 10,000m2 and other commercial areas and variables with nearby facilities. The high floor area of the building is considered to be high, and the high vacancy rate of other businesses, rather than major commercial and commercial facilities are limited to wholesale and retail sectors. Although the sales facilities are limited to the wholesale and retail sectors, the number of nearby facilities is highly available and thus the public service rate is low. The analysis showed that the vacancy rate of the general merchant was higher than the vacancy rate of the collective merchant, and that, from the perspective of the lessee, the standard building loss rate could be lower because of the relatively large effort to attract tenants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.279
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHousing Finance ResearchSame topicEnergy and Environmental SystemsFrench-language works237,207