La perpétuelle inauthenticité. Problématiser la quête d’authenticité chez les personnes ayant des problèmes de santé mentale « sévères et persistants »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude explore, à partir d’un cadre théorique foucaldien, le rapport à l’authenticité chez les individus ayant des problèmes de santé mentale « sévères et persistants », via l’analyse des actes de vérité qu’ils émettent sur leurs expériences d’autogestion. Les résultats indiquent que l’authenticité est conçue comme l’amas de six marqueurs ontologiques, dont la plupart sont perçus comme inatteignables. Nous postulons que cet écart à l’authenticité résulte 1) de l’hypernormalité de l’authenticité; et 2) de conflits entre les marqueurs d’authenticité. L’inauthenticité est réfléchie comme caractéristique potentielle de la folie contemporaine et des pistes de réflexion pour l’intervention sociale sont proposées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".