Geografie letterarie della natura: appunti per un'esplorazione more than human
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Come concetto connotato culturalmente e come oggetto di ricerca, la natura ha luoghi, ma ha anche linguaggi. Uno di questi, la narrazione letteraria, è al centro della riflessione qui proposta. Adottando la prospettiva delle more than human geographies, il contributo esplora due spazi (letterari), quello urbano e quello montano, in cui la natura prende forma come soggetto attivo e creativo. Con l'analisi della natura nell'avanzare dell'urbanizzazione diffusa del Nordest, raccontata da Effetto domino di Romolo Bugaro(2015), e nell'Italia interna dell'Appennino tosco-emiliano de I passi nel bosco di Sandro Campani (2020), il testo letterario viene letto come un ecosistema di voci e soggetti, capace di suggerire sguardi altri sul rapporto fra la natura e l'umano, dentro e fuori la pagina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".