MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178154076 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-3

Abstract 3: Deep learning-based integration of esophageal cancer morphology with genomics

2021· article· en· W3178154076 on OpenAlexaff
Ruchika Verma, Wei Wu, Neeraj Kumar, Elizabeth A. Yu, Won‐Tak Choi, Sarah E. Umetsu, Trever G. Bivona

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsophageal cancerStromal cellCancerAdenocarcinomaDeep learningConvolutional neural networkMedicineOncologyArtificial intelligenceCancer researchInternal medicinePathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Esophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality world-wide. Even with advanced treatment options available, patients with esophageal cancer have a poor 5-year survival rate of 16%. Genomic studies of esophageal cancer have revealed frequently mutated genes involved in different oncogenic pathways. In this study, we attempted to predict genomic alterations, pathological and clinical features directly from H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of individual esophageal cancer cases by utilizing modern deep learning methods. We used WSIs with esophageal cancer obtained from TCGA and annotated cancerous epithelial and stromal components separately for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (n= 25 cases for each) to create a training set. Subsequently, patches of size 256×256 pixels were extracted, and a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained for semantic segmentation of tumor epithelium and stromal pixels. Tumor epithelium regions identified by the first U-Net CNN were fed into a Squeezenet model to learn to distinguish between EAC and ESCC in the training phase. Finally, for each subtype (EAC and ESCC), separate Densenet models were trained to predict gene mutation status. We also trained independent Densenet models to predict tumor stage, grade, and survival outcome from the tumor epithelial patches. After training, we tested these models on an independent validation set obtained from TCGA (n = 99) and UCSF (n = 25) patients, ensuring patient level separation between the training and the validation sets. We obtained an average AUC of 0.90 and 0.87 for epithelium vs. stromal and EAC vs. ESCC classification, respectively, on the validation datasets. These models enabled us to predict tumor stage, grade, and survival outcome with an accuracy of > 0.9. TP53 gene alterations were detected in over 50% of esophageal cancer cases, and our model was able to predict TP53 gene mutation status on WSIs with an AUC of 0.91. Overall, this study demonstrates how deep learning algorithms can aid in better understanding and predicting key biological and clinical features of aggressive malignancies at both population and individual patient level. This integration of artificial intelligence with molecular and histopathologic features could also help to accelerate precision cancer diagnosis and treatment in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Ruchika Verma, Wei Wu, Neeraj Kumar, Elizabeth Yu, Won-Tak Choi, Sarah Umetsu, Trever Bivona. Deep learning-based integration of esophageal cancer morphology with genomics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207