MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178225769 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.01810

Manifold Geometry with Fast Automatic Derivatives and Coordinate Frame\n Semantics Checking in C++

2018· preprint· W3178225769 on OpenAlexaff
Leonid Koppel

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, programming, and type systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCompilerOverhead (engineering)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Frame (networking)Semantics (computer science)Key (lock)Representation (politics)RoboticsExpression (computer science)Artificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Coordinate systemAlgorithmGeometryProgramming languageMathematicsRobotEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer vision and robotics problems often require representation and\nestimation of poses on the SE(3) manifold. Developers of algorithms that must\nrun in real time face several time-consuming programming tasks, including\nderiving and computing analytic derivatives and avoiding mathematical errors\nwhen handling poses in multiple coordinate frames. To support rapid and\nerror-free development, we present wave_geometry, a C++ manifold geometry\nlibrary with two key contributions: expression template-based automatic\ndifferentiation and compile-time enforcement of coordinate frame semantics. We\ncontrast the library with existing open source packages and show that it can\nevaluate Jacobians in forward and reverse mode with little to no runtime\noverhead compared to hand-coded derivatives. The library is available at\nhttps://github.com/wavelab/wave_geometry .\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicLogic, programming, and type systemsFrench-language works237,207