Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Physical activity practice(PA) during pregnancy has been widely recommended. Recently, the American College of Obstetrics&Gynecology has emphasized that regular practice of physical activity during pregnancy, prior to a detailed obstetric assessment, is safe and carries a number of health benefits not only on the pregnant woman but also on the fetus. Scientific evidence suggests that PA during pregnancy improves cardiovascular health, prevents the onset of gestational diabetes and hypertension, shorter postpartum recovery time and facilitates labor METHOD: Descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative-focused study, developed in health service providers in the city of Bogota-Colombia. 397 pregnant women, aged 18-42, were evaluated without medical contraindications for exercise, who voluntarily completed the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire. This questionnaire allows to determine energy expenditure(EE), through metabolic equivalents(MET), in the categories of: household and care work, occupational work, sports or exercise activities and activities intended for transport, relating this EE with weight, size, BMI, weeks and quarter of pregnancy RESULTS: The pregnant women evaluated recorded a body weight of 67.8 ± 10.1 kg; size 1.6 ± 0.1 m; BMI 26.5-3.7 kg/m2. As for EE during the gestational period, per quarter is recorded: 1st-quarter:254 ± 152MET; 2st-quarter:228 ± 122 MET; 3rd-quarter;227 ± 119MET. For pregnant women throughout pregnancy, the mean EE was found to be 231 ± 124MET. As for EE throughout pregnancy, although it decreases over the course of pregnancy, no significant differences were evident in the 3-trimesters. Similarly, no correlations were identified in terms of EE and the period of pregnancy (r<:0,1). The relationship between weight and trimester of pregnancy is highlighted as a significant correlation (r = 0.19;p = 0.0001) CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the increase in the period of pregnancy does not correlate with an increase in EE, this associated with the daily activities of the assessed pregnant women; and despite a slight decrease in EE relative to the trimester of pregnancy, this decrease is not statistically significant
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".