Measurements of Acoustical Parameters in the Roman Theatre of Verona
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The attention by the scholars to the acoustics of ancient open-air theatres is increased considerably through the centuries and among the historical buildings survived to nowadays the acoustics of the Roman theatre of Verona has not been deeply investigated, yet. In this paper, the outcomes of the acoustic survey undertaken in the Roman theatre has been analysed in two different ways: by a standard methodology representing the graphs of the acoustic parameters, and by the creation of a video showing in real-time the impulse response (IR) and relative reflections occurred at the surfaces of the cavea. The latest technique has been realised by using a multichannel spherical microphone array, which calls back the MIMO approach that is capable to have complete spatial control of the sound propagation through space. The authors of this paper illustrate a brief history of the theatre, including the description of the construction elements that characterise this important historical building, and two distinct procedures to show the results obtained after the survey, highlighting the coplanarity of explanation by using the MIMO approach, as followed by the second methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it