MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178535633 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001299

Binasal Visual Field Defects Due to Sickle Cell Maculopathy

2021· article· en· W3178535633 on OpenAlexaff
Jason M. Kwok, Trishal Jeeva-Patel, Edward Margolin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual fieldMedicineMaculopathyOptometryOphthalmologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: A 26-year-old African American man with sickle cell disease noticed blurry vision in both eyes after a recent complicated hospital admission for sickle cell crisis. Anterior and posterior segment examination of each eye was normal, but visual field testing revealed binasal scotomas. Optical coherence tomography of the macula demonstrated severe thinning of the temporal inner retina, suggesting previous bilateral occlusions of terminal retinal arterioles involving the temporal macula, an uncommon complication of sickle cell disease. This case is a reminder that retinal pathology should always be considered as a potential cause of unexplained visual field defects and highlights the role of macular OCT in evaluation of these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207