MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3178630784 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.202584-f

Soins virtuels innovants pour la ventilation mécanique à domicile

2021· article· fr· W3178630784 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Reshma Amin, Regina Pizzuti, Francine Buchanan, Louise Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political science2019-20 coronavirus outbreakArtMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POINTS CLÉS Le programme LIVE (Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement) est un nouveau programme de soins virtuels, qui a été déployé pendant la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pour permettre aux centres spécialisés d’offrir un soutien virtuel aux personnes qui ont

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→