MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178798070 · doi:10.18280/ria.350310

Test Scheduling and Test Time Reduction for SoC by Using Enhanced Firefly Algorithm

2021· article· en· W3178798070 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gokul Chandrasekaran, Gopinath Singaram, Rajkumar Duraisamy, Akash Sanjay Ghodake, Parthiban Kunnathur Ganesan

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirefly algorithmComputer scienceReduction (mathematics)Firefly protocolAlgorithmScheduling (production processes)System on a chipReliability engineeringReal-time computingEmbedded systemEngineeringMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System-on-Chip (SoC) is an integration of electronic components and billions of transistors. Defects due to the base material is caused during the manufacturing of components. To overcome these issues testing of chips is necessary but total cost increases because of increasing test time. The main issues to be considered during testing of SoC are the time taken for testing and accessibility of core. Effective test scheduling should be done to minimize testing time. In this paper, an effective test scheduling mechanism to minimize testing time is proposed. The test time reduction causes test cost reduction. The Enhanced Firefly algorithm is used in this paper to minimize test time. Enhanced Firefly algorithm gives a better result than Ant colony and Firefly algorithms in terms of test time reduction thereby reduction test cost takes place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207