UAV-Aided Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Computation Offloading in Future IoT Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern 5G services with stringent reliability and latency requirements such as smart healthcare and industrial automation have become possible through the advancement of Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC). However, the rigidity of ground MEC and its susceptibility to infrastructure failure would prevent satisfying the resiliency and strict requirements of those services. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been proposed for providing flexible edge computing capability through UAV-mounted cloudlets, harnessing their advantages such as mobility, low-cost, and line-of-sight communication. However, UAV-mounted cloudlets may have failure rates that would impact mission-critical applications, necessitating a novel study for the provisioned reliability considering UAV node reliability and task redundancy. In this paper, we investigate the novel problem of UAV-aided ultra-reliable low-latency computation offloading which would enable future IoT services with strict requirements. We aim at maximizing the rate of served requests, by optimizing the UAVs’ positions, the offloading decisions, and the allocated resources while respecting the stringent latency and reliability requirements. To do so, the problem is divided into two phases, the first being a planning problem to optimize the placement of UAVs and the second an operational problem to make optimized offloading and resource allocation decisions with constrained UAVs’ energy. We formulate both problems associated with each phase as non-convex mixed-integer programs, and due to their non-convexity, we propose a two-stage approximate algorithm where the two problems are transformed into approximate convex programs. Further, we approach the problem considering the task partitioning model which will be prevalent in 5G networks. Through numerical analysis, we demonstrate the efficiency of our solution considering various scenarios, and compare it to other baseline approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it