MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178898588

Quelles expériences du droit et de la justice pour les parents LGBTQ+ qui se séparent ?

2021· preprint· fr· W3178898588 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emilie Biland-curinier, Joanie Bouchard, Kévin Lavoie, Isabel Côté, Michelle Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueSPIRE (Sciences Po) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité LavalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse les rapports au droit et à la justice des parents LGBTQ+ vivant au Québec, tels qu'ils se nouent au moment des séparations conjugales. Il souligne que la porté et les limites de la politique d'inclusion vis à vis de ces parents, engagés depuis le début des années 2000 dans cette province canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPIRE (Sciences Po)Same topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207