MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178964691

Controlling ill-behaved flows with active queue management in DiffServ networks

2003· article· en· W3178964691 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Shu, Deyun Gao, Ou Yang, Liqiang Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive queue managementQueueComputer scienceComputer networkQueueing theoryQueue management systemFluid queueDistributed computingNetwork congestionReal-time computingNetwork packet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new active queue management mechanism called the RIO-SD (RED IN and OUT with Selective Dropping) to control ill-behaved flows in DiffServ networks. Under this scheme, core routers are not required to maintain per-flow state, and the ill-behaved flows can be identified based on the drop history of the OUT-profile virtual queue. Control is effected by placing two pre-filters in front of the IN-profile and OUT-profile virtual queues respectively. Simulation results indicate that our approach can also improve the performance of other normal flows. Our work demonstrates that our algorithm is robust and simple to use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical EngineeringSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207