MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179090024

The yield of winter wheat depending on sowing terms

2021· article· en· W3179090024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSowingAgronomyYield (engineering)Winter wheatSugar beetGerminationField experimentBiologySemis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To study the influence of sowing dates of winter wheat of Kubus variety on yield, including late ones after sugar beet. The following sowing dates were investigated: September 1, 10, 20, and 30, October 10 and 20, November 10 and 30, and December 20.  It was found that at later sowing dates, the field germination decreases: in October to 88.0–86.8 %, in November to 84.1–80.4 %, in December to 76.4 %. Plant survival was 84.1–94.2 %. Plant density, productive stems, and tillering coefficient were the highest during sowing on September 30. During sowing in November and December, the plants did not reach the beginning of tillering phase; the coefficient of productive tillering approached one (1.12–1.14). It was found that the number of ears in the ear was stable for all sowing dates (16.6–17.4 pieces), the maximum number of grains in the ear (48 pieces) was recorded during the sowing on September 30. The weight of grain from the ear in all variants was high; during sowing on September 30, October 10, and 20, it was equal to 1.61–1.60 g. In November-December, it decreased up to 1.55 g, 1.52 g, and 1.45 g. The highest grain yield (9.43 t/ha) of winter wheat in the western forest-steppe of Ukraine was formed during sowing on September 30. In November, the yield decreased by 1.31 t/ha and 1.89 t/ha compared to sowing on September 30 and by 2.40 t/ha in December.  The optimal sowing dates of winter wheat of the Kubus variety in the conditions of the western Forest-Steppe fall on the period from September 20 to October 10. In the conditions of global climate changes, the possibility of obtaining 7–8 t/ha of grain during sowing in November-December is substantiated. For a yield of 9 t/ha and above, the following combination of structural elements is optimal: the density of productive stems should be approximately 600 pcs/m2, the weight of grain from the ear – 1.60 g. Keywords: winter wheat, sowing terms, yield structure, yield.   References   Allard, F., Vanasse, A., Pageau, D., Tremblay, G., Durand, J., Vachon, E. (2019) Determination of optimal sowing terms and densities of winter wheat under Quebec growing conditions. Can. J. Plant Sci., 99, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2018-0165 Ding, D.Y., Feng, H., Zhao, Y., He, J.Q., Zou, Y.F., Jin, J.M. (2016) Modifying winter wheat sowing terms as an adaptation to climate change on the loess plateau. Agron. J., 108, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj15.0262 Dong, Y., Wei, B., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y. (2019) Performance of winter-seeded spring wheat in Inner Mongolia. Agronomy, 9, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090507 Gandjaeva,  L. (2019) Effect of sowing terms on yield of winter wheat cultivars Grom, Asr and Kuma in Khorezm region. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 25(3), 474–479. Havryliuk, M.M., Kalenych, P.Y. (2018) Influence of ecological factors on the yield of new varieties of winter wheat in the conditions of the Southern Forest-Steppe. Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 31, 25-29. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201801-04  (In Ukrainian). Falcone,  G., Stillitano, T., Montemurro, F., De Luca, A.I., Gulisano, G.,  Strano, A. (2019) Environmental and economic assessment of sustainability in Mediterranean wheat production. Agronomy Research, 17(1), 60–76, doi: https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.011 Kyrychenko, V.V., Popov, S.I., Kobyzeva, V.P. (2018) Peculiarities of sowing winter crops on farms of Kharkiv region for the 2019 harvest. Kharkiv. Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS. (In Ukrainian). Liashenko, V.V., Marenych, M.M. (2010) Influence of sowing dates on the productivity of winter wheat crops. Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy. 2, 46–50. (In Ukrainian). Madhu, U., Begum, M., Salam, A., Sarkar, S.K. (2018) Influence of sowing date on the growth and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Arch. Agr. Environ. Sci. 3(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2018.0301014 Marenych, M., Kaminsky,  V.F., Bulygin, C.Yu., Hanhur, V.V., Korotkova, I.V., Yurchenko, S.O., Bahan, A.V., Taranenko, S.V., Liashenko, V.V. (2020)  Optimization of factors of managing productive processes of winter wheat in the Forest-Steppe. Agricultural Science and Practice, 7(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp7.02 Oleksiak, T. (2014) Effect of sowing terms on winter wheat yields in Poland. Journal of Central Europen Agriculture, 15(4), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/15.4.1513 Petrychenko, V.F., Lykhochvor, V.V. (2020) Plant growing. New technologies for growing field crops: a textbook. 5th ed., Corrected, supplemented. Lviv. Ukrainian technologies. 806  p. doi: https://doi.org/10.31073/roslynnytstvo5vydannya (In Ukrainian). Polovyi, V.M., Lukashchuk, L.Ya., Huk, L.I. (2018) . Efficiency of intensification of winter wheat growing technology in the Western Forest-Steppe. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 11, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201811-05 (In Ukrainian). Senapati, N., Brown, H.E., Semenov, M.A. (2019) Raising genetic yield potential in high productive countries: Designing wheat ideotypes under climate change. Agric. For. Meteorol., 271, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.025 Shakalii, S.M., Bahan, A.V., Barat, Yu.M. (2020) Influence of sowing dates on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Scientific reports of NULES of Ukraine. 1(83). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2020.01.007  (In Ukrainian). Shevchenko, I.A., Poliakov, O.I., Zhuravel, V.M. (2017) Soil preparation and sowing of winter grains and oilseeds in Zaporizhia region in 2017. Zaporizhzhia. IOC NAAS (In Ukrainian). Sokolov, V.M., Bushulian, O.V., Lytvynenko, M.A., Linchevskyi, A.A., Babaiants, O.V. (2018) Recommendations for conducting a set of autumn field works in agricultural formations of Odessa region in 2018. Odesa. Astroprynt (In Ukrainian). Stasiv, O.F., Sedilo, H.M., Konyk, H.S. (2019) Features of technologies for growing winter cereals for the 2020 harvest (autumn complex of works): recommendations. Lviv - Obroshino. Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region NAAS (In Ukrainian). Tkachuk, V.P., Tymoshchuk, T.M. (2020) Influence of sowing dates on winter wheat productivity. Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 3, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202003-05 (In Ukrainian). Ulich, O.L. (2018) Trends in sowing dates of soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the southern part of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine during climate transformation. Bulletin of Agricultural Science. 6, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201806-03 (In Ukrainian). Volkohon, V.V., Moskalenko, A.M., Berdnikov, O.M., Yehorov, O.V. (2015) Recommendations for sowing winter crops on farms of Chernihiv region for the 2016 harvest. Chernihiv. Institute of Agricultural Microbiology and Agroindustrial Production of NAAS. 28 p.  (In Ukrainian). Yaroshenko, S.S. (2020) Frost resistance and grain productivity of winter wheat depending on agrotechnical cultivation methods. Zb.nauk. pr. Institute of Grain Crops NAAS Grain crops.  4(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0107  (In Ukrainian).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it