MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3179173161 · doi:10.1101/2021.07.05.451013

A new platform for high-throughput therapy testing on iPSC-derived, immature airway from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

2021· preprint· en· W3179173161 on OpenAlexaff
Jia Xin Jiang, Leigh Wellhauser, Onofrio Laselva, Irina Utkina, Zoltán Bozóky, T. Gunawardena, Zoe Ngan, Sunny Xia, Paul D. W. Eckford, Félix Ratjen, Theo J. Moraes, John Parkinson, Amy P. Wong, Christine E. Bear

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystic fibrosisRespiratory epitheliumInduced pluripotent stem cellMedicineAirwayCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorMutantBioinformaticsEpitheliumCancer researchPathologyBiologyInternal medicineEmbryonic stem cellGeneGeneticsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induced pluripotent, stem cell (iPSC)-derived models of airway tissue have successfully modeled the primary defect in regulated chloride conductance caused by the major Cystic Fibrosis causing mutation, F508del. However, it remains unclear if iPSC-derived airway cultures can be used in high-throughput therapy development for F508del and rarer mutations. There is an urgent need for airway tissue models that reflect the variability of patient-specific responses and are scalable for therapy development. In the current work, we describe a robust, high-throughput fluorescence assay of mutant CFTR function in iPSCs differentiated to immature airway epithelium. This assay measures reproducible functional responses to modulators targeting either the major CF mutant F508del or the nonsense mutant: W1282X-CFTR. We show that the ranking of patient-specific responses to interventions in this stem-cell based model recapitulates the ranking observed in primary nasal epithelial cultures obtained from the same individuals. In summary, these proof-of-concept studies show that this novel platform has the potential to support therapy development and precision medicine for Cystic Fibrosis patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances→French-language works237,207→