MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179201887 · doi:10.1094/pdis-05-21-0936-pdn

First Report of Grapevine Rupestris Vein Feathering Virus in <i>Vitis vinifera</i> from Japan

2021· article· en· W3179201887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yoshinao Aoki, Shunji Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyViticultureVitis viniferaOenologyRootstockBotanyWine grapeHorticulturePhylloxeraWineCultivar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of wine grapes is gaining widespread popularity and being carried out on approximately 2,200 hectares of land in Japan. Scions grafted onto rootstocks generally have been imported from the EU, USA, New Zealand, and Australia into Japan. Unfortunately, viruses have spread in Japanese vineyards by slipping through the net of plant quarantine. Grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus (GRVFV), which was detected in a Greek grapevine accessions, is a member of genus Marafivirus in family Tymoviridae (El Beaino et al. 2001). GRVFV has been detected in many countries such as USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Uruguay, and Pakistan (Jo et al. 2015; Eichmeier et al. 2016; Xiao and Meng 2016; Blouin and MacDiarmid 2017; Reynard et al. 2017; Cho et al. 2018; Mahmood et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2020). Herein we report GRVFV infection in Vitis vinifera L. grapevines from Japan. In February 2021, dormant canes from 18 V. vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon with leafroll-like disease symptoms, growing in a vineyard located in Kanagawa Prefecture, were collected. No typical vein banding symptom by GRVFV were observed in the grapevines during the growing season. Total RNA was isolated from the canes using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit and QIAshredder (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and subjected to cDNA synthesis using a PrimeScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). RT-PCR was performed with GRVFV_6156F and GRVFV_6600R primers for GRVFV detection (Reynard et al. 2017). The expected 445 nucleotides (nt) amplification product was obtained from four of 18 grapevines. Sequence analysis of the products revealed 91% identities to corresponding sequences of GRVFV isolates CHASS (KY513702) and Mauzac (KY513701) from Switzerland. Genome walking to determine the whole-genome sequence of the GRVFV isolates from the four grapevines was performed. Briefly, the upstream and downstream of the 445 nt amplification product were amplified from first-strand cDNA using gene-specific primers designed from the product and CHASS-specific primers. Each amplified fragment was Sanger sequenced. Next, gene-specific primers were designed to obtain the complete genome of GRVFV as 13 overlapping DNA fragments from each of the four grapevine samples. An identical complete genome of 6,704 bp was assembled from the overlapping DNA fragments using MEGA 10 software and named as NA1 isolate (DDBJ accession no. LC619667). Phylogenetic analysis of the NA1 genome and corresponding sequences of GRVFV from other countries showed that NA1 formed a cluster with isolate NZ ChTK0004 from New Zealand (MF000326; Supplementary Figure 1). In pairwise comparisons, the complete NA1 genome was most identical at 88% and 87%, respectively to isolates NZ ChTK0004 and Mauzac. The predicted amino acid sequences of NA1 polyprotein shared high homologies (96%) to the corresponding polyprotein sequences of NZ ChTK0004 and Mauzac, suggesting that NA1 is genetically similar to GRVFV isolates from New Zealand and Switzerland. The NA1-infected Cabernet Sauvignon was co-infected with Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3, Grapevine virus A, and Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus according to RT-PCR assay for grapevine virus detection (Nakaune and Nakano 2006). The results underscore the importance of intensifying quarantine measures to prevent introduction of exotic viruses via contaminated wine grape vegetative cuttings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207