Host Plant Volatile Lures Attract Apanteles polychrosidis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Ash Trees Infested With Caloptilia fraxinella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caloptilia fraxinella Ely (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), the ash leaf-cone roller, is an aesthetic pest of horticultural ash trees (Oleaceae, Genus Fraxinus ) in prairie communities across Canada. Because pesticide use is undesirable in urban centers, biological control of C. fraxinella is a preferred approach. The native parasitoid wasp, Apanteles polychrosidis Vierek (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), has shifted hosts and is the primary parasitoid of C. fraxinella in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and has potential as a biological control agent. Here, in an effort to increase parasitism of C. fraxinella , lures releasing methyl salicylate (MeSA) and two green leaf volatiles (GLVs), [( Z )-3-hexenol, and ( Z )-3-hexenyl-acetate], at both low and high release rates, were tested to enhance attraction and retention of A. polychrosidis in infested ash trees. Attraction of A. polychrosidis to baited trees was measured by capture on yellow sticky cards positioned in the tree canopy, and wasp activity was assessed by the parasitism rate of C. fraxinella . More male and female A. polychrosidis were captured on yellow sticky traps positioned in trees baited with the low dose of both MeSA + GLVs than to unbaited, infested ash trees. The increased attraction of wasps did not correlate with an increase in parasitism of C. fraxinella . The high release rate lures did not enhance attraction of A. polychrosidis to infested ash trees. Parasitism rate, however, was negatively correlated with host density in both field experiments. There was no evidence of close-range attraction to lures in an olfactometer assay. Synthetic HIPVs attract A. polychrosidis to ash trees infested with C. fraxinella , but the effect of wasp attraction on parasitism rate requires further research if HIPVs are to be used to enhance biological control in this system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".