MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence and Clinical Significance of Worsening Tricuspid Regurgitation Following Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From the PARTNER IIA Trial

2021· article· en· W3179443520 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Cremer, Tom Kai Ming Wang, L. Leonardo Rodriguez, Brian R. Lindman, Yiran Zhang, Alan Zajarías, Rebecca T. Hahn, Stamatios Lerakis, S. Chris Malaisrie, Pamela S. Douglas, Philippe Pîbarot, Lars G. Svensson, Samir Kapadia, Martin B. Leon, Wael A. Jaber

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Interventions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)CardiologyIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineAortic valve replacementValve replacementAortic valveSurgeryStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the incidence of worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR) following transcatheter compared with surgical AVR (TAVR, SAVR), and the impact of worsening TR on outcomes, is ill-defined. Accordingly, among patients randomized to TAVR or SAVR, we describe the differential incidence of worsening TR and its association with survival. Methods: From the PARTNER IIA trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves IIA), 1334 patients were included with baseline and 30-day postprocedure core-lab echocardiograms. Worsening TR was defined as deterioration of ≥1 grade from baseline to 30 days. Outcomes included cardiovascular and all-cause death between 30 days and 2 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations with worsening TR; survival analyses were performed to assess associations with mortality. Results: Worsening TR occurred in 17.3% (125/721) of TAVR and 27.0% (165/611) of SAVR patients. On multivariable analysis, SAVR (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.40–3.11]), female sex (odds ratio, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.44–3.42]), atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.03–2.51]), and right ventricular enlargement (odds ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.17–4.31]) were associated with worsening TR. Cardiovascular and all-cause death occurred in 9.0% (26/290) and 17.9% (52/290) of patients with worsening TR, compared with 4.8% (50/1042) and 10.9% (114/1042) without worsening TR, respectively. In patients with worsening TR, cardiovascular and all-cause death were similar in TAVR compared with SAVR, (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.55–2.16]) and (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.62–1.87]), respectively. After adjustment, worsening TR was independently associated with cardiovascular (hazard ratio, 3.62 [95% CI, 2.08–6.29]) and all-cause death (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.37–3.27]). Conclusions: Worsening TR is associated with female sex, atrial fibrillation, right ventricular enlargement, and SAVR. Regardless of mode of AVR, worsening TR is similarly associated with a poor prognosis. Future studies should focus on whether preventing or treating worsening TR improves outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01314313.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207