MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3179453426

Les Chevaliers de Colomb

2008· article· fr· W3179453426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Mollier

Bibliographic record

VenueCairn.info · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Franc-maconnerie n’est pas la seule a alimenter l’imaginaire des influences occultes. Comme par un effet de miroir, l’Eglise romaine elle-meme a suscite des accusations similaires. Au XVIIIe siecle, la denonciation du « complot jesuitique » acquiert une telle force qu’elle aboutit a la dissolution et a l’interdiction de la Compagnie de Jesus dans plusieurs etats, y compris parmi les plus catholiques. Aujourd’hui, les medias – ou la litterature avec l’affaire extraordinaire du Da Vinci Code – alertent regulierement l’opinion publique sur le poids de l’Opus Dei et de ses reseaux sur certains milieux dirigeants. Mais il existe aussi une authentique societe secrete catholique : l’Ordre des Chevaliers de Colomb. Les Chevaliers de Colomb sont assez peu connus car ils sont une institution essentiellement americaine. Cette veritable Franc-maconnerie catholique est nee aux Etats-Unis, son organisation, son mode de fonctionnement et son imaginaire sont profondement marques par la culture americaine et notamment par ce qu’elle a de plus exotique pour les Europeens, d’ou notre difficulte a cerner le phenomene. Des Etats-Unis, les Chevaliers de Colomb ont etendu leur action a tout le continent americain, au Canada ou s’est notamment constituee une branche francophone au Quebec et dans les differents pays d’Amerique latine et surtout au Mexique ou ils ont joue un role important. Or, les Chevaliers de Colomb ont emprunte leur forme a la Franc-maconnerie et ils constituent, depuis maintenant un peu plus d’un siecle, l’une des composantes du lobby catholique conservateur outre-Atlantique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCairn.info→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→