MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179458065 · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c05816

Designing Ultrasmall Carbon Nanospheres with Tailored Sizes and Textural Properties for High-Rate High-Energy Supercapacitors

2021· article· en· W3179458065 on OpenAlexafffund
Xudong Liu, Madagonda M. Vadiyar, Jung Kwon Oh, Zhibin Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceSupercapacitorChemical engineeringCapacitanceCarbon fibersMesoporous materialAqueous solutionSpecific surface areaNanotechnologyPorosityElectrolytePolymerizationElectrodeComposite materialComposite numberPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work demonstrates the efficient design of ultrasmall porous carbon nanospheres with tailored sizes (5–40 nm in diameter) and optimized intrasphere textural properties for high-rate high-energy supercapacitor application. The carbon nanospheres are synthesized via a miniemulsion polymerization technique followed by KOH activation. It is shown that dual-step activation renders enlarged intrasphere micropores/mesopores, facilitating enhanced ion transports. Meanwhile, a decrease in nanosphere size from 40 to 5 nm significantly improves the rate performance, demonstrating the pronounced size effects due to enhanced intrasphere ion transport. The optimum dual-step-activated carbon nanosphere sample with an average sphere size of 5 nm, ACNS5-2, shows the high specific capacitances along with outstanding high-rate capabilities in both aqueous (272 F g–1 at 0.5 A g–1 and 81.6% of retention at 200 A g–1) and EMIMBF4 (223 F g–1 at 0.5 A g–1 and 67.2% of retention at 100 A g–1) electrolytes in symmetrical two-electrode cells. In EMIMBF4, ACNS5-2 displays a high energy density of 48 Wh kg–1 at a high power density of 14 kW kg–1, suggesting excellent energy storage efficiency. Moreover, the performance of ACNS5-2 competes well with or is superior to some best-performing porous carbon-based materials reported in the literature for supercapacitor applications even at lowered temperatures (at −20 °C: 150 F g–1 at 0.5 A g–1 with a capacitance retention of 64% at 10 A g–1) and high mass loading (8 mg cm–2: 205 F g–1 at 0.5 A g–1 with a capacitance retention of 64.5% at 20 A g–1). Our results, combined with structure–performance relationships, offer valuable guidelines for the rational design of carbon nanomaterials of optimum supercapacitive performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207