MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179541516 · doi:10.3390/math9172162

Algorithmic Determination of a Large Integer in the Two-Term Machin-like Formula for π

2021· article· en· W3179541516 on OpenAlexafffund
Sanjar M. Abrarov, Rajinder K. Jagpal, Rehan Siddiqui, Brendan M. Quine

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsThoth Technology (Canada)York University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaYork University
KeywordsTerm (time)Integer (computer science)Integer programmingComputer scienceMathematicsApplied mathematicsAlgorithmPhysicsProgramming languageAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our earlier publication we have shown how to compute by iteration a rational number u2,k in the two-term Machin-like formula for π of the kind π4=2k−1arctan1u1,k+arctan1u2,k,k∈Z,k≥1, where u1,k can be chosen as an integer u1,k=ak/2−ak−1 with nested radicals defined as ak=2+ak−1 and a0=0. In this work, we report an alternative method for determination of the integer u1,k. This approach is based on a simple iteration and does not require any irrational (surd) numbers from the set ak in computation of the integer u1,k. Mathematica programs validating these results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207