MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179548136 · doi:10.52904/0718-4646.2007.65

Science and Forest Concessions = Las concesiones forestales y la ciencia

2007· article· es· W3179548136 on OpenAlexaff
Bastiaan Louman, Fernando Carrera G., J. E. Arce, Lincoln Quevedo

Bibliographic record

VenueCiencia & Investigación Forestal · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsCanadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo es presentado un análisis preliminar sobre la contribución de las concesiones al apropiado manejo forestal, discutiéndose cómo estas pueden contribuir a generar condiciones más favorables en las tierras de bosques estatales. Se discute cuatro condiciones, relacionadas con tenencia segura de los recursos forestales, control sobre las operaciones forestales, ambiente financiero favorable y acceso a suficiente información. Las concesiones pueden incidir positivamente sobre tenencia, control de operaciones y en menor medida, mejor ambiente financiero. Sin embargo, para el mejoramiento de la disponibilidad de información se ha hecho necesaria asistencia externa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.028
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCiencia & Investigación ForestalSame topicForest Management and PolicyFrench-language works237,207