MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Flexible Printed Potentiometric Sensor for Potassium Ion Sensing

2021· article· en· W3179631001 on OpenAlexaff
Yiwen Chen, Sharmistha Bhadra

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotentiometric titrationPotentiometric sensorPotassiumIonMaterials scienceComputer scienceChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a flexible printed potassium ion (K+) sensor with good sensitivity is developed. The sensor is a two-electrode structure potentiometric sensor. It is fabricated by printing the working and reference electrode on a flexible Kapton film, followed by drop casting of an ion-sensitive membrane (ISM) on the working electrode. For the ISM, ion exchangers are deliberately doped into ionophores to obtain a stable and reproducible response and reduce the effects of interfering ions. The sensor has achieved a sensitivity of 50.0mV/log[K+] with an accuracy of 0.19 log[K+] and resolution of 0.17 log[K+] over 10-5to 1 M K+concentration range. The interfering ions over the range present in saliva do not significantly affect the sensor’s measurement. The sensor can be used to detect the concentration of K+accurately from the human saliva in order to achieve quick and non-invasive health diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS)Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207