MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179694233 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1945631

Some correlation tests for vectors of large dimension

2021· article· en· W3179694233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorDimension (graph theory)StatisticsNull hypothesisStatistical hypothesis testingCorrelationNull distributionNull (SQL)Norm (philosophy)Asymptotic distributionDistribution (mathematics)Applied mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisTest statisticComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a random sample of n iid p-dimensional vectors, each partitioned into b sub-vectors of dimensions pi, i=1,…,b, tests for zero correlation of sub-vectors are presented when pi ≫ n and the distribution need not be normal. The test statistics are composed of U-statistics based estimators of the Frobenius norm measuring the distance between the null and alternative hypotheses. Asymptotic distributions of the tests are provided for n,pi → ∞, with their finite-sample performance demonstrated through simulations. Some related tests are discussed. A real data application is also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it