MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179775240 · doi:10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-qgprm

Engineering a Non-Natural Photoenzyme for Improved Photon Efficiency

2021· preprint· en· W3179775240 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bryce T. Nicholls, Daneil Oblinsky, Sarah I. Kurtoic, Daria Grosheva, Yuxuan Ye, Gregory D. Scholes, Todd K. Hyster

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCatalysisProtein engineeringBiochemical engineeringAbsorption (acoustics)Quantum dotFunction (biology)PhotonMaterials scienceChemistryNanotechnologyComputer scienceEnzymePhysicsOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoenzymes are biological catalysts that use light to convert starting materials to products. These catalysts require photon absorption for each catalyst turnover, making quantum efficiency an important optimization parameter. Flavin-dependent 'ene’-reductases (EREDs) display latent photoenzymatic activity for synthetically valuable hydroalkylations; however, protein engineering has not been used to optimize this non-natural function. Here, we describe a protein engineering platform for the high throughput optimization of photoenzymes. A single round of engineering results in improved catalytic function toward the synthesis of 𝛾, 𝛿, 𝜀-lactams, and acyclic amides. Mechanistic studies indicate that key mutations can alter the enzyme's excited state dynamics, enhance its photon efficiency, and ultimately increase catalyst performance. Transient absorption spectroscopy reveals that engineered variants display dramatically decreased radical lifetimes – indicating a shift toward a concerted mechanism. Overall, this platform enables the development and optimization of photoenzymes for tailored applica-tions in chemical synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadical Photochemical ReactionsFrench-language works237,207