PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENODAAN AGAMA MELALUI ORNAMEN-ORNAMEN SIMBOL KEAGAMAAN DI RUANG PUBLIK PADA WILAYAH HUKUM KOTA JAMBI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penghinaan atau penodaan terhadap suatu agama yang diakui di Indonesia sering terjadi namun penodaan agama melalui ornament=ornament symbol agama di ruang public pada wilayah Kota Jambi menimbulkan keributan umat Islam dan viral di Indonesia pada tahun 2016. Hal ini tentunya sangat mengganggu kehidupan beragama dan sangat membahayakan kedamaian hidup bermasyarakat dan kesatuan bangsa. Dengan adanya kepentingan hukum yang harus dilindungi tersebut maka sudah sewajarryalah jika pemerintah memiliki kewajiban untuk mengatur kehidupan beragama di Indonesia melalui penerbitan peraturan perundang-undangan yang khusus mengatur tentang kehidupan. Kajian ini menjelaskan tentang kendala-kendala di dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana penodaan agama melalui ornamen-ornamen simbol keagamaan dan kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh POLDA Jambi dalam mengatasi kendala-kendala yang ditemui dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana penodaan agama melalui ornamen-ornamen simbol keagamaan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".