Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le mot « merveille » que l’on trouve dans la Bible est issu de la racine pele / pe - lamed - alef et a ete traduit generalement par le mot grec thauma qui signifie « etonnement ». C’est ici, a la faveur de ces significations engendrees par les traductions, qu’une rupture et un malentendu se nouent entre la pensee biblique et la philosophie. Depuis Platon et Aristote, l’etonnement est le commencement de la philosophie. Etonnement devant ceci que le monde est. Or la Bible rapporte les merveilles a Dieu et nomme l’emerveillement devant la justice de Dieu et la loi a laquelle nous nous conformons. Cette divergence entre Bible et Philosophie ne releve pas des concepts de foi et de savoir elabores dans l’histoire occidentale, mais de pensees differentes sur le monde et l’experience. Est-il possible cependant, dans nos langues travaillees par les concepts philosophiques, d’entendre l’enseignement qui provient de la Bible ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".