MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W318004608 · doi:10.4000/pistes.3661

Du constat à l’action : 15 ans de recherche en réinsertion professionnelle des travailleurs au Québec

2002· article· fr· W318004608 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Raymond Baril

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConsciencePolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche sur la réadaptation et la réinsertion professionnelle des travailleurs avec des lésions professionnelles est relativement récente au Québec. Cet article présente un bilan de la recherche au Québec dans les 15 dernières années, soit depuis la publication du « rapport Spitzer ». Orienté principalement sur les développements dans le domaine des sciences humaines et sociales ainsi que clinique, cet article retrace les grandes étapes qui ont marqué cette histoire courte mais féconde. Les premières études ont fait prendre conscience d’une problématique de réinsertion professionnelle des travailleurs jusque-là pratiquement ignorée par les chercheurs. Très tôt orientée vers l’action, la recherche a cherché à outiller les intervenants et à développer de nouveaux modèles d’intervention. L’émergence de nouvelles formes de prise en charge qui allient les aspects cliniques et la prise de conscience de l’importance des facteurs reliés au milieu de travail dans la réinsertion professionnelle des travailleurs orientent les nouvelles recherches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0160.016
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santéSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207