MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3180090245

Qué duro es vivir: Historia de una emigrante

2008· article· es· W3180090245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manuel Huertas

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos de la Memoria · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImmigration and Intercultural Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPersonaArtCartographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolJuanita, nos muestra su vida desde su mas tierna infancia hasta que por fin, se afinca en Estados Unidos y comienza una manera de vivir de las que se puede denominar normal. Se van sucediendo hechos en diferentes paises: Espana, Brasil, Canada y Estados unidos, que van forjando y perfilando la personalidad de nuestro personaje, que hacen de ella una persona entranable. Esa gran mujer que es Juanita, va desgranando vivencias que se van produciendo en tropel, a veces con dificultades de expresion, pero siempre con confianza, con un carino desbordante y una jovialidad que arrolla a pesar de sus 74 anos. Aunque este relato biografico es el de Juanita, no podemos olvidar a Sixto, su marido y companero, que la ha acompanado y sigue acompanandola en su vida. EnglishJuanita shows us her life starting with her early childhood until she finally settles down in the USA and she sets off a way of living which one could call normal. Various facts happen one after another in several countries: Spain, Brazil, Canada and USA; along this time these facts build up and shape our character's personality, and change her into a cherished person. Juanita, a great woman, goes on telling us her personal experience which gushes forth in huddle, sometimes with an inadequate language command, but always with trust, with an overflowing affection and bursting joviality in spite of her 74 years. Although this is Juanita's biographical story, we cannot forget Sixto, her husband and her companion, who accompanied her and continues accompanying her in her life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos de la MemoriaSame topicImmigration and Intercultural EducationFrench-language works237,207